Showing posts with label 2009. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2009. Show all posts

Up in the Air (2009)

It's funny. 2009 really doesn't feel like that long ago. In 2009, I was living in Tahiti. I was 18 and gratefully less affected by the terrible economic recession that blew away America. I remember hearing about my friends and my friend's parents losing jobs. It felt like a distant reality, but strangely close to home since it was hurting people I loved.

This might have affected me more had I seen it in the moment, but I think watching it now - five years later - allowed for an interesting reflection on my adult life. Where I'm headed, where I've been, what I haven't experienced, and what I'm sure glad I didn't experience in 2009.

Ryan Bingham (George Clooney) is a corporate downsizing expert. In other words, he fires people for a living. He spends 75% of the year flying across the country doing other boss's dirty work. Him being a dick sort of comes with the territory, but he isn't disagreeable by any means. He's simply a man that's good at what he does: suavely helping these eliminated excess employees "transition." He gives them an opportunity, not the end of the line.

He's a proud loner. The airport, the airplane, the air itself is his home, and he's perfectly fine that way. He's in the zone when in transit, when going for drink at terminal 2, when renting vehicles. No wife, no kids, he relishes his frequent flyers position and his life pursuit is to reach 10 million miles. The films hinges on the development of his character and Clooney majestically makes Ryan relatable to all of us. This is George Clooney just getting better with age, and he delivers an absolutely masterful performance. I don't think we really realize how great he actually is in this movie. He does everything so effortlessly! He laughs the laugh of a sad man who doesn't know he's sad. He speaks purposefully but with an undertone of uncertainty. He develops but it isn't an instantaneous, forced change by any means.

This change is initially instigated when Ryan meets Alex (Vera Farmiga). Alex is, in essence, the female version of Ryan. They meet in his zone. In transit. For a drink. For a one night stand. Ryan learns a lot about himself in his fleeting relationship with Alex. He is terrified yet entranced by this mirror image of himself. Farmiga is fabulous as this smart and sexy commitment-free frequent flyer. She's good in anything.

Ryan develops further in his travels with Natalie (Anna Kendrick). Natalie is the newbie assigned to Ryan. He shows her the ropes of execution. Natalie is 23, ambitious, dismisses Ryan as "old", and a bit hot-headed. Ryan's career is threatened when Natalie introduces a cyber-firing method that will make his up in the air position obsolete. They travel together for a spell, ruining people's lives and discussing their views on life (which vastly differ from each other). Anna Kendrick fantastically contributes to this acting trio - all three were nominated for acting Oscars. These three characters are the meat of the film. The story is guided by a simple slice, a mere taste of these three lives intertwining - and their dialogue with each other, their simple human, realistic interactions are what make this film beautiful.
What makes this film so incredible is its poignant connection to reality. This is only Jason Reitman's third film after the marvelous Thank You For Smoking (2005), and Juno (2007). This guy - now age 37 - has some SERIOUS talent up his sleeve, he can do no wrong with character films. For the realism, Reitman used real footage of real people who had just been fired. It's a film for the times, with people like you and me reacting to some of the worst news they could ever receive - a worst fear for many. This stuff is REAL. I have never been fired, but I could feel it. I felt the pain, and the anger. THE FEELS, MAN.

I loved this movie because though, admittedly, it was kind of depressing, it's subtle. I love how unforcedly Ryan develops in his character. He doesn't go all 180 and settle down and realize he's missing out on life like something Hallmark. Despite what many movies teach us, change is hard and people don't actually change who they are over the weekend. Ryan doesn't. And it's refreshing. And yet, you still see a flicker of change growing deep down there. The start of a new outlook on life for the aged flyer.

Five years later, or whatever, but this might have been my pick for Best Picture in 2009. Closely matched with Inglourious Basterds. And I definitely think some acting Oscars should have been won.

Though the film certainly centers on our three leads, the supporting acting cannot be ignored. Jason Bateman, JK Simmons, and Zach Galifanakis in their small roles were enjoyable as usual. Up in the Air is a character study, and provides a great insight into people we see everyday but don't necessarily know. 8/10

Star Trek (2009)

I am a Star Wars girl. It's true. It's also true that I haven't yet been able to bring myself to watch the other Star Trek movies. I thought it was against some sort of nerd-code to like both. You know? Anyone else with me on this? Apparently you can like both. I just haven't quite made it to that level yet.

That being said, these new movies are the shiz. Do I think it's a LITTLE weird that JJ Abrams is doing both Star Wars AND Star Trek? Yes. It's kind of weird. And a little traitorous (the nerd-code thing). But he made Star Trek 4000 times cooler by turning it into Star Wars! Does that mean that next year when Star Wars Episode VII comes out it will be morphed into the Star Trek realm a little? Perhaps. We'll get there when we get there. 

But for the meantime, I will enjoy these movies.

All I knew about the 'verse before I saw this a few years back was some stuff about Captain Kirk, the Enterprise, and Spock, of course. And, like, William Shatner. And stuff from Galaxy Quest. So take that knowledge, and throw it all through an awesome time travel loop and you got my experience with Star Trek

This story starts on the day our beloved James Tiberius Kirk was born, the same day his hero father is martyred saving his all-star crew from some time traveling alien bastards in search of Ambassador Spock. Who is also just a little dude. Irrelevant. The bulk of the story takes place 25 years later and Kirk has grown up (played by Chris Pine), but still a younger, more brash, rebellious version than the Kirk most fans are used to. See this whole time-traveling thing works out great because we get to enjoy younger, more attractive versions of the usual Enterprise crew-members who essentially feed off their older selves. Kirk, Spock (Zachary Quinto), Dr. Leonard "Bones" McCoy, (Karl Urban), Uhura (Zoe Saldana), and Scotty (Simon Pegg) make up that crew, and they go through their growing pains with each other. When Spock meets his future self (played by Leonard Nimoy) he is shocked to hear that in this alternate all-too-familiar universe of original Spock & Kirk, he and Captain Kirk were best friends. Ultimately, the young crew, combat those same time-traveling alien bastards that killed Papa Kirk.

Besides all the cool time travel stuff (which, frankly, I'm super into), what gets me with this film is the characters and their interaction aboard the maiden voyage of the Enterprise. It being an origin story, we learn very interesting details about Kirk and Spock. Jim T's father made history in his battle against the nefarious Nero (awesomely hard-to-recognizely played by Eric Bana) and left Kirk with that legacy's shadow to hide from. He's convinced by Commander Pike (Bruce Greenwood) to join Starfleet, but his rebellious hot rod attitude inevitably clashes with straight-nosed half-Vulcan/half-human Spock. Spock is thoughtfully played by Zachary Quinto. He has a troubling background and goes through some serious emotional turmoil when his planet is blown up in front of him - Alderaan style. Spock is in a constant battle between his natural Vulcan instinct to be un-emotional and to proceed business as usual with his human side fighting from deep within to explode. Quinto's performance delivers something special: he stays true to character yet delivers every line and every gesture with subdued emotion and the feeling that something hot is boiling underneath his calm exterior.
If you're going to do a reboot - especially a reboot of a series so massive and with so many dedicated followers - this is the way to do it. Abrams goes back to the beginning (who doesn't love origin stories?) he brings out familiar characters but gives them a new twist, and he delivers everything with top-notch special effects, a clever story, great action sequences, and a good script to boot. If I knew more about science, I'm sure I'd be able to hate along with the rest of you on the actual implications of black holes and whatever. If I knew more about Star Trek in general, I might be able to do some hating that I'm sure I'll be throwing around when the new Star Wars comes out. But even long-timers can't hate on that new and improved Enterprise. It's beautiful. When it comes down to it, if we're talking about spectacle, 2009's Star Trek has got it. 8/10

Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince (2009)

And so it goes on, and the adventures of Harry Potter are just getting better.  Sick of hearing about him already?  Too bad.
Now that Voldy let the cat out of the bag that he’s returned, wizards are on the alert and Death Eaters are becoming more and more conspicuous, attacking people and wreaking havoc left and right in the Muggle AND Wizarding World.  Harry’s back for his sixth year at school and he’s more buddy buddy with Dumbledore than he ever has been – if possible.  He’s got Harry taking “Voldemort lessons” and the two of them learn about the dark wizard’s haunting past.  Meanwhile, besides Harry’s night job with the headmaster, his sixth year at Hogwarts isn’t at all boring.  Snape’s finally made it as the Defense Against the Dark Arts teacher, Harry is a master at potions with a little help from his mysterious second-hand textbook, and word on the street is that Draco’s the latest member of Death Eater club… and he’s crying in the bathroom.  Oh, and he’s supposed to kill Dumbledore.
I have seen every Harry Potter movie in the theater, most on opening day, some at midnight, but Half Blood Prince came out while I lived in Tahiti.  So I saw it in French.  And if a movie can still be entertaining in FRENCH, then it’s got to be a pretty good movie.  Then, when I finally saw it in English, tears were flooding left and right and I was, to put it lightly, blown away.
Here’s what I love about this installment.  It takes its time.  It’s funny, it’s sad, it’s emotional, it is as realistic as you can get for a movie about wands and broomsticks.  It’s human.  One of my favorite scenes takes place at Harid’s hut, where Professor Slughorn (Jim Broadbent), Hagrid (Robbie Coltrane) and Harry (Daniel Radcliffe) gather around mourning for Hagrid’s demon spider pet, Aragog.  I didn’t know that I could get choked up over that vicious beast’s death.  It’s just so honest, complete with swelling music, Fang the dog howling, and Slughorn makin’ up eulogies.
It’s also funny. Like, lol funny.  The romances, though break ups and heart ache still inevitably ensue, are more mature than the high school type pairing off that was goin’ down in #4 and #5.  Don’t get me wrong, there’s still plenty of snogging.  And let me just say that Jessie Cave as Lavender Brown is incredibly entertaining as Ron’s main squeeze.  But from Quidditch to Christmas dates, there isn’t a dull moment.  The excellent writing coupled with the impeccable deliveries of the actors mesh together so perfectly.
“She’s only interested in you because she thinks you’re the chosen one!”

“But I AM the chosen one.”

“That’s my Won-Won!”
“What do you think he sees in [Ginny]?”

“She’s smart, funny, attractive… “
“Attractive?”
“Well you know, she has nice skin.”
So you think he is going out with her because she has nice skin?”
“Well, I dunno, I’m just saying it could be a contributing factor.”

On that note, I’m also glad that they gave Quidditch one last chance.  If only to see Weasley King teach those Quaffles a lesson.
The fearsome threesome are at their best.  Rupert Grint is funnier than ever, Emma Watson is, well, still good… she didn’t need much improvement, but she’s awesome.  Daniel Radcliffe has found his niche as our rugged hero, and he finally captures the emotional intelligence that our character in the novel is going towards in his later years.  Alan Rickman is still the ultimate badass and Tom Felton gives his best performance to date.  But man, I wish they’d done his character differently in the earlier movies.  It doesn’t mean so much to see him crumble underneath the pressure with him being such a weenie in the first films.  But, whatever, at least he’s better.  Jim Broadbent probably takes the cake for giving the most intriguing and complex performance.  I always thought that Slughorn was an interesting character but Broadbent really took him further.  I love how he and Harry interact.  Helena Bonham Carter is still good as crazy lady Belatrix Lestrange.
If all that weren’t enough, Michael Gambon finally earned his keep as the esteemed Albus Dumbledore.  I haven’t been a fan of him thus far, and he’s still no Richard Harris, but I wouldn’t have cried over him if he hadn’t of done an above-par job.  I’m sorry for hating you so much before, Mr. Gambon.  I respect you now and love what you did with one of my favorite characters.  That’s all.
While they weren’t able to throw it all in (can they ever?) David Yates did a fantastic job with Tom Riddle/Voldemort’s back story.  Meeting the enemy with haunting special effects and an amazing performance by Hero Fiennes-Tiffin was everything I could have asked for as a Potter nerd.  Yates is the mannnn, and boy am I glad that he’s got charge of the rest of the series.
Lastly, the ambiance is wonderful.  Every scene is beautiful, whether it be the architecture of the castle or the beauties of the grounds.  “I’ve never noticed how beautiful this place is,” laments Harry.  This is the calm before the storm -and it was already pretty stormy.  But any remaining bits of normalcy are blown to bits in the last two installments.  Also, the music by Nicholas Hooper is absolutely breathtaking.  Watching Dumbledore bring out the big guns in the creepy cave would not be what it is without the tear-jerking accompaniment.  That scene is also one of the best in the film.  I needed a bucket to collect all those tears.  It’s just so sad… and heart wrenching… and everything.  It’s amazing.
Probably my favorite installation thus far, but we’ve still got two to go.  That might change.  9/10

An Education (2009)

Man am I thrilled that this isn’t just some other movie about getting knocked up.  Oh wait, did I just ruin it for you?  My bad.
The darling Carey Mulligan stars as Jenny, a bright student in ’60s London with high hopes to get into Oxford.  She loves reading, French culture and music, is an accomplished cellist, and basically just wants to learn all there is to learn.  Then one day, the tall, charming, and suave David (Peter Sarsgaard) helps her get home in the rain.  Yes, in the rain.  He impresses her with his knowledge and cultured lifestyle, and she’s darn well swept off her feet.  Jenny’s parents (Alfred Molina, and Cara Seymour) are strict, but naive.  Even they are taken with David’s sophistication and wit.  David cultures Jenny by taking her to plays, concerts, fancy restaurants, and even Paris.  Jenny may or may not be falling for the middle-aged man, and his intentions may or may not be sinister.
First thing’s first: I’m a sucker for coming of age stories.  I can’t remember if I’ve mentioned this on here yet or not.  But it’s true.  When I started hearing about this movie around award’s season last year I was so pumped to watch it.  I must admit, I wasn’t disappointed and I might even say it exceeded my expectations.
It’s enchanting, really.  Actually scratch that.  Carey Mulligan is enchanting.  I know I’m probably majorly influenced by the media but the thought couldn’t escape me how much she reminds me of Audrey Hepburn.  Oh she’s darling.  She makes the movie from some random teenage tragedy to something real.  We are all surrounded by Jennys, or perhaps we ARE a Jenny, and she transforms this character into someone relatable and strong.  She’s a strong, sharp heroine.  Her love of life radiates in her eyes and her joy is contagious – even through the screen.
David too is an interesting character and well portrayed by Peter Sarsgaard, that sly dog.  In many ways, he reminds me of the character Willoughby in Sense and Sensibility. There are moments where he seems genuinely interested in Jenny and enjoys her company.  Then there are times where all he seems to want is some action.  The two together make a good acting team and their relationship seemed plausible, albeit unfortunate.
The rest of the cast is solid too, featuring Olivia Williams, Rosamund Pike, Dominic Cooper, and Emma Thompson. The script by Nick Hornby (About a Boy) is also excellent and moving.  A fine directing job by Lone Scherfig.
What sold me on this movie, though Mulligan is definitely the highlight, were the parents  - Molina and Seymour.  I love that they actually, what’s the word, exist? Too often are there stories where the parents play no factor into the ruin of teenage lives, but I love that these parents are obviously trying their best for their daughter and that they love her.  They are a perfect example of concern, and love.  The story (based off Lynn Barber’s memoir of the same name) seemed fresh and true.  I mean, 16-year-olds make mistakes all the time.  This is a great example to young girls that there is still potential to grow, even if something crazy happens to mess things up.  The future awaits.  I love that about this.
Another highlight is the music.  It’s beautiful.  The end.
Okay, so maybe this story isn’t so new.  Maybe it IS just the same ol’ same ol’ that you get in any teen coming of age story.  Maybe we HAVE heard this story a thousand times.  But to me it felt different.  It actually felt special.  Maybe it just hit me in a certain way.  I can’t really tell.  But something touched me in this movie.  It’s worth the watch anyway.    9/10

2012 (2009)

So I saw this in theaters here in Tahiti.  Since I had only seen it in French – I decided to see it once more in English.  Turns out I had no need.  This isn’t a terrible movie, but it isn’t a good one either.  Predictable with a capital P – right down to the order in which characters die.  It's another Roland Emmerich symphony à la Day After Tomorrow (2004) and Independence Day (1996). There’s no arc, no emotional development – just burn, flood, and collapse.  I’m sure I have no need to unveil the plot because it’s nothing more than the world as we know it will come to an end on December 21, 2012.  This is king of disaster movies, combining any and all natural horrors imaginable.  The narrative takes us along the path of Jackson Curtis (John Cusack) and the relationship with his children and estranged wife (Amanda Peet).  Through a series of miracles he manages to save them and his wife’s new boyfriend (Thomas McCarthy) from a collapsing Los Angeles.  Annnnd a collapsing Yellowstone.  Annnnd a collapsing Las Vegas.  Good thing the boob doctor (boyfriend) knows how to fly planes!
There’s the political side of the story.  Turns out the government has been aware for three years already of the oncoming disaster.  We’ve got the good hearted President (Danny Glover) who dies alongside his country (oops, sorry if I ruined it for you…) and the do-what-it-takes Chief of Staff (Oliver Platt).  Through many generous donations from snobby billionaires, ginormous arcs have been built and hidden in China with hopes to preserve what is possible of mankind.  And a few animals.  It’s just Noah’s arc on steroids.
I love John Cusack and I’ll see him in anything but even he gives a half-hearted performance (though he is nonetheless likeable).  All in all it’s a ridiculous end of the world film, but if you dig that kind of stuff I won’t stop you from watching it.  It delivers what we expect it to deliver, and there’s something to be said for that. 5/10

The Princess and the Frog (2009)

Will people start throwing rocks at me if I say I’m not a… what’s the word… die hard Disney fan?  I mean, don’t get me wrong – Disney has its place in the world.  Sleeping Beauty is beautiful, and Aladdin has fun songs but, with the exceptions of Beauty and the Beast and Mulan, I feel like I’ve grown out of that stage.  And it’s not animation – I feel completely different about Pixar.  I could watch Ratatouille, Toy Story, and The Incredibles of my own choosing, but I haven’t seen Cinderella since I was six.
Anyway – in a great year for animation, P&F holds its own as a charming story about a spunky girl named Tiana (voiced by Anika Noni Rose) who has a dream of owning her own restaurant in New Orleans.  When Prince Naveen (voiced by Bruno Campos) comes to town, the whole community goes berserk, including her silly and spoiled friend Charlotte (voiced by Jennifer Cody – and this character’s a lot of fun).  Naveen strikes a shady deal with The Shadow Man (voiced by Keith David) and turns into -  you guessed it – a frog.  And then what happens – you guessed it – Tiana kisses the frog.  But Tiana is not a princess, so she turns into a frog too.  Bummer.
I never thought I’d hear “voodoo witch doctor” and “Disney” spoken in the same sentence.  There are some fun musical numbers (Randy Newman!), clever dialogue, and colorful characters (Louis the gator being my favorite).  I must admit that though our prince is suave and funny, and our princess is down to earth, hard working, and likeable – their connection felt superficial to me.  It didn’t have that same magic that Belle and the Beast had or other such examples.  But this is a minor flaw.
I laughed out loud, the animation is refreshing, it’s charming and worth the watch.  Though I doubt I’ll be buying it on DVD. 7/10