Showing posts with label 1998. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1998. Show all posts

Following (1998)

So I think by this point everybody’s on board that Christopher Nolan is the bad ass of the times.  The best of the best, the leader of the pack, a movie-lover’s dream.  This is everybody’s man’s debut film.  Following is probably the most similar to Memento of any of his other movies, but it is also completely different in its own right.  It’s almost Hitchcock-esque.  Not quite so trippy as Inception, but still as gripping.  It’s a low-budget gem.
Following is, initially, about a man named Bill who follows people to pass the time.  He’s a writer, but has no current job, and wants to learn about human nature from his followees.  He had to set rules for himself though, so as not to become too obsessive or, like, perverted, and his most important rule of all was never to follow the same person twice.  But why set rules unless you can break them, eh?
He follows a man named Cobb.  (More than once).  But this mysterious, handsome man in a dark suit knows that our guy’s up to something and confronts him.  They talk, and share their stories.  Turns out Cobb’s a serial burglar, and he invites our man to go on some jobs with him.  These ain’t your run-of-the-mill-steal-the-jewelry-burglars, though.  Cobb’s more interested in the personal items of their victims.  ”Everyone has a box.”  He drinks their wine, rummages through photos, takes a few things here and there.  His intention is that “you take it away, show them what they had.”
They become partners, and Cobb shows the young man what’s up.  The young man starts some burglary projects of his own, changes his appearance, starts a relationship with a blonde femme-fatale.  Things spin out of control soon enough however.  Never follow someone twice, kids.
The chronology is similar to Memento.  Awesome.  It’s not as systematic as that, however (color real-time scenes, black & white backwards scenes, etc.)  But it’s still out of order, and possibly even awesome-r in this modern film noir.  Who would have thought that this method of storytelling would be so epic?  It can so effectively reveal the "what's-up" of a mystery.  This remains true for Following.  The big end wouldn’t be half as cool were it not for the messed up timeline.  Hats off to you, Chris.
Its length (just over an hour) and detached feel are strengths as well.  The only character credited with a name is Cobb.  This also felt like something Hitchcock would do (and did).  It’s very straightforward, and lacks strong emotion.  You learn the facts about the characters, you learn about the victims.  You can’t always feel what the young man is feeling, however.  It’s hard to describe, because it’s a character story, or study rather, but it still has this edgy, detached feel.
The incomprehensible small budget of just $6,000 is put to perfect use in the gritty underbelly of London.  Everything feels dirty, creepy, and mysterious.  The excellent photography combined with the scenery contributes to the suspense and ambiance.  The no-name cast is also excellent, Jeremy Theobald, Alex Haw, and Lucy Russell.  It’s a surprise to me that they did nothing else, they’re quite good in this – especially Alex Haw as Cobb.. and he doesn’t even have a Wikipedia page!
If you’re just hopping on the Chris Nolan bandwagon, I’d check this one out.  If you loved Memento, this is his father.  Following is another excellent film that credits Nolan as good as any other mainstream effort of his. 9/10

The Truman Show (1998)

Man.  Where do I even begin?  Every time I watch this show it just gets better.  Do I start with the incredibly clever plot?  As summed up best by this dialogue between Truman Burbank (Jim Carrey) and creator Christof (Ed Harris):
“Who are you?”
“I am the Creator – of a television show that gives hope and joy and inspiration to millions.”
“Then who am I?”
“You’re the star.”
“Was anything real?”
“You were real.  That’s what made you so good to watch.”
Perfectly interspersed with back story (I’d kill to see some more archive footage), off-set characters, and exclusive interviews with Christof – The Truman Show is creativity at its finest.  It’s especially ironic since it came before the world’s reality TV obsession.  It is perfectly well paced, clever yet deep, and feels fresh and new, even twelve years later.
The acting is sensational.  Jim Carrey has never been better – curse you Academy for the Oscar snub, there is absolutely no excuse.  This is not the first time Peter Weir has given new range to labeled actors (Harrison Ford in Witness for example) and Carrey is fantastic.  Being in nearly every scene he is funny, serious, emotional, and we come to really care about him.  He sweeps us along in this fantastic journey and gahhhhh I can’t say enough that he should have been nominated.
The icing on the cake, IMO, is Ed Harris.  Nominated for a Supporting Actor Oscar in this role (at least something was recognized), he is the perfect mixture of obsessive, arrogant, creatively insane, and eerily quiet.  One of the best crafted scenes in the movie is when Truman is finally reunited with his father.  This is where we see what “The Truman Show” is all about.  Just after Marlon is getting lines whispered in his ear for the set up, we are treated with Christof’s executive power to the whole show.  “Hold the fog.  No, no close up yet.  Wait for it… cue music. [music grows] Now zoom in. There, that’s it.”  Applause, applause.  “That’ll boost up the ratings!” someone shouts.  And Christof breaths a sigh of relief.  It’s tough being so creative.
The camerawork, acting, scenery, dialogue, music, cinematography, supporting performances (Noah Emmerich), direction, and mood are top notch.  This is a solid movie and I would make no changes, FOR REALZ. 10/10
“And in case I don’t see you – good afternoon, good evening, and good night.”
p.s. This is my first 10 point review.  Kind of exciting, no?