Up in the Air (2009)

It's funny. 2009 really doesn't feel like that long ago. In 2009, I was living in Tahiti. I was 18 and gratefully less affected by the terrible economic recession that blew away America. I remember hearing about my friends and my friend's parents losing jobs. It felt like a distant reality, but strangely close to home since it was hurting people I loved.

This might have affected me more had I seen it in the moment, but I think watching it now - five years later - allowed for an interesting reflection on my adult life. Where I'm headed, where I've been, what I haven't experienced, and what I'm sure glad I didn't experience in 2009.

Ryan Bingham (George Clooney) is a corporate downsizing expert. In other words, he fires people for a living. He spends 75% of the year flying across the country doing other boss's dirty work. Him being a dick sort of comes with the territory, but he isn't disagreeable by any means. He's simply a man that's good at what he does: suavely helping these eliminated excess employees "transition." He gives them an opportunity, not the end of the line.

He's a proud loner. The airport, the airplane, the air itself is his home, and he's perfectly fine that way. He's in the zone when in transit, when going for drink at terminal 2, when renting vehicles. No wife, no kids, he relishes his frequent flyers position and his life pursuit is to reach 10 million miles. The films hinges on the development of his character and Clooney majestically makes Ryan relatable to all of us. This is George Clooney just getting better with age, and he delivers an absolutely masterful performance. I don't think we really realize how great he actually is in this movie. He does everything so effortlessly! He laughs the laugh of a sad man who doesn't know he's sad. He speaks purposefully but with an undertone of uncertainty. He develops but it isn't an instantaneous, forced change by any means.

This change is initially instigated when Ryan meets Alex (Vera Farmiga). Alex is, in essence, the female version of Ryan. They meet in his zone. In transit. For a drink. For a one night stand. Ryan learns a lot about himself in his fleeting relationship with Alex. He is terrified yet entranced by this mirror image of himself. Farmiga is fabulous as this smart and sexy commitment-free frequent flyer. She's good in anything.

Ryan develops further in his travels with Natalie (Anna Kendrick). Natalie is the newbie assigned to Ryan. He shows her the ropes of execution. Natalie is 23, ambitious, dismisses Ryan as "old", and a bit hot-headed. Ryan's career is threatened when Natalie introduces a cyber-firing method that will make his up in the air position obsolete. They travel together for a spell, ruining people's lives and discussing their views on life (which vastly differ from each other). Anna Kendrick fantastically contributes to this acting trio - all three were nominated for acting Oscars. These three characters are the meat of the film. The story is guided by a simple slice, a mere taste of these three lives intertwining - and their dialogue with each other, their simple human, realistic interactions are what make this film beautiful.
What makes this film so incredible is its poignant connection to reality. This is only Jason Reitman's third film after the marvelous Thank You For Smoking (2005), and Juno (2007). This guy - now age 37 - has some SERIOUS talent up his sleeve, he can do no wrong with character films. For the realism, Reitman used real footage of real people who had just been fired. It's a film for the times, with people like you and me reacting to some of the worst news they could ever receive - a worst fear for many. This stuff is REAL. I have never been fired, but I could feel it. I felt the pain, and the anger. THE FEELS, MAN.

I loved this movie because though, admittedly, it was kind of depressing, it's subtle. I love how unforcedly Ryan develops in his character. He doesn't go all 180 and settle down and realize he's missing out on life like something Hallmark. Despite what many movies teach us, change is hard and people don't actually change who they are over the weekend. Ryan doesn't. And it's refreshing. And yet, you still see a flicker of change growing deep down there. The start of a new outlook on life for the aged flyer.

Five years later, or whatever, but this might have been my pick for Best Picture in 2009. Closely matched with Inglourious Basterds. And I definitely think some acting Oscars should have been won.

Though the film certainly centers on our three leads, the supporting acting cannot be ignored. Jason Bateman, JK Simmons, and Zach Galifanakis in their small roles were enjoyable as usual. Up in the Air is a character study, and provides a great insight into people we see everyday but don't necessarily know. 8/10

Star Trek (2009)

I am a Star Wars girl. It's true. It's also true that I haven't yet been able to bring myself to watch the other Star Trek movies. I thought it was against some sort of nerd-code to like both. You know? Anyone else with me on this? Apparently you can like both. I just haven't quite made it to that level yet.

That being said, these new movies are the shiz. Do I think it's a LITTLE weird that JJ Abrams is doing both Star Wars AND Star Trek? Yes. It's kind of weird. And a little traitorous (the nerd-code thing). But he made Star Trek 4000 times cooler by turning it into Star Wars! Does that mean that next year when Star Wars Episode VII comes out it will be morphed into the Star Trek realm a little? Perhaps. We'll get there when we get there. 

But for the meantime, I will enjoy these movies.

All I knew about the 'verse before I saw this a few years back was some stuff about Captain Kirk, the Enterprise, and Spock, of course. And, like, William Shatner. And stuff from Galaxy Quest. So take that knowledge, and throw it all through an awesome time travel loop and you got my experience with Star Trek

This story starts on the day our beloved James Tiberius Kirk was born, the same day his hero father is martyred saving his all-star crew from some time traveling alien bastards in search of Ambassador Spock. Who is also just a little dude. Irrelevant. The bulk of the story takes place 25 years later and Kirk has grown up (played by Chris Pine), but still a younger, more brash, rebellious version than the Kirk most fans are used to. See this whole time-traveling thing works out great because we get to enjoy younger, more attractive versions of the usual Enterprise crew-members who essentially feed off their older selves. Kirk, Spock (Zachary Quinto), Dr. Leonard "Bones" McCoy, (Karl Urban), Uhura (Zoe Saldana), and Scotty (Simon Pegg) make up that crew, and they go through their growing pains with each other. When Spock meets his future self (played by Leonard Nimoy) he is shocked to hear that in this alternate all-too-familiar universe of original Spock & Kirk, he and Captain Kirk were best friends. Ultimately, the young crew, combat those same time-traveling alien bastards that killed Papa Kirk.

Besides all the cool time travel stuff (which, frankly, I'm super into), what gets me with this film is the characters and their interaction aboard the maiden voyage of the Enterprise. It being an origin story, we learn very interesting details about Kirk and Spock. Jim T's father made history in his battle against the nefarious Nero (awesomely hard-to-recognizely played by Eric Bana) and left Kirk with that legacy's shadow to hide from. He's convinced by Commander Pike (Bruce Greenwood) to join Starfleet, but his rebellious hot rod attitude inevitably clashes with straight-nosed half-Vulcan/half-human Spock. Spock is thoughtfully played by Zachary Quinto. He has a troubling background and goes through some serious emotional turmoil when his planet is blown up in front of him - Alderaan style. Spock is in a constant battle between his natural Vulcan instinct to be un-emotional and to proceed business as usual with his human side fighting from deep within to explode. Quinto's performance delivers something special: he stays true to character yet delivers every line and every gesture with subdued emotion and the feeling that something hot is boiling underneath his calm exterior.
If you're going to do a reboot - especially a reboot of a series so massive and with so many dedicated followers - this is the way to do it. Abrams goes back to the beginning (who doesn't love origin stories?) he brings out familiar characters but gives them a new twist, and he delivers everything with top-notch special effects, a clever story, great action sequences, and a good script to boot. If I knew more about science, I'm sure I'd be able to hate along with the rest of you on the actual implications of black holes and whatever. If I knew more about Star Trek in general, I might be able to do some hating that I'm sure I'll be throwing around when the new Star Wars comes out. But even long-timers can't hate on that new and improved Enterprise. It's beautiful. When it comes down to it, if we're talking about spectacle, 2009's Star Trek has got it. 8/10

Oblivion (2013)

The year is 2077. It's very interesting to me how these dystopian post-apocalyptic films want us to feel uncomfortable by always choosing a year that's not so far in the future. Why not 2248? Why not 2301? No, filmmakers want us to connect. They want us to feel ownership of our mother earth. 2077, this is us and our children we're talking about, here. We're nervous and uncomfortable because the 2077 Earth is much different than the earth we all know and love. It's an earth that's covered more with radioactive waste than it is people after a bunch of alien scavengers attacked it and strip it of its resources. 

Jack Harper (Tom Cruise) (why is EVERYONE named Jack?) is one of the last remaining people around. He chills in his little floating house in the sky with his working partner Victoria (Andrea Riseborough) while he repairs drones (little robot dudes) and gathers more resources from the planet. He is part of a massive operation to help prepare the way for the rest of Earth's population to make it to Titan, one of Saturn's moons. His memory has been wiped of the tragic war, and he's got questions with no answers. He doesn't go prying too far, though, until he finds a crashed spaceship with human survivors and he realizes that nothing can be taken at face value.

Oblivion is a fun film. It is a visual, sensational treat. I watched this cold turkey and please, if you're into sci-fi stuff, and if you've never heard of this before like I hadn't, then don't read this and go watch that instead. It's a good film experience. Then come back and we can talk about it some more. And if you've never seen Blade Runner, 2001: a Space Odyssey, I Am Legend, Prometheus, Wall-E, Minority Report, District 9 or especially Moon (I could keep going), then you'll probably leave thinking this is the greatest sci-fi film ever made. But... really, you should probably watch those first.

That being said, there will be spoilers.

So yeah, it's fun. But I found myself wondering the whole time whether all of this was going to come together or if any of it was going to make any sense and if I was ever going to care about any of it making sense. It's all surface. It's all superficial.

Let's talk about the plot: it's a good idea. It's a really good idea that Joseph Kosinski (TRON: Legacy) is executing for a great sci-fi film however let's be real, it's 2001 and we all KNEW the second there was an alien or robot or drone or whatever it's called we all knew that it was Hal 9000, red light and everything. Of course the aliens were the enemy! All of this Jack memory loss bull was a red herring that anyone with half a lick of sci-fi knowledge could pick out. All of the big reveals, all of the twists were predictable as anything. Yes, the alien is the enemy. Yes, Jack isn't who he thinks he is and there's a much bigger thing going down here. Yes, the Russian is his wife. I mean, he finds this random chick who's been asleep for 60 years, obviously she's important to the story I mean he was DREAMING about her. We're supposed to be surprised she's his wife? 
My other big complaint has to do with character. Granted, it's probably part of the plot and Jack's character concept that we don't relate to him or feel any connection to him at all. He's, like, a clone and stuff. (Though if you watch Moon, it doesn't HAVE to be that way. Kids, just watch Moon, it's way better). But all of the characters were wooden. They could have all been clones, it was really hard to tell the difference. I didn't feel anything for any of the characters at all. The golden opportunity for contrast and emotional involvement is wasted when we are introduced to a bunch of human survivors on Earth. I think of A.I.: Artificial Intelligence (2001) and the masterful contraposition illustrated when we go to the big bad real world. It's in those transitional moments that we feel connected to the characters and understand where the plot is headed. In Oblivion, even when they were being killed by drones, I felt nothing. I didn't connect with Morgan Freeman, I didn't even connect with the wife with Julia (Olga Kurylenko) or whatever her name is. I mean, Jack's a clone, but Julia's human! You'd think that she'd have some sort of emotional response, something to SAY at least when she finally sees her husband after 60 years in cyber sleep.

However, the visuals are absolutely breath taking. I was taken in and completely captivated by the beauty - I feel like everything was made by Apple. The camerawork, lighting, and first 12 minutes of the film were completely incredible, and those were all big pluses. Also, M83's music was pretty sweet. Claudio Miranda won the Academy Award for cinematography for Life of Pi (2012) and it's clear that he's the man who takes our breath away. I just wish there was some heart below the beautiful surface that we could connect with and wish to come back for more. But when all acting is wooden, and when there are way too many plot holes, and when it rips off some of the greatest sci-fi movies of all time, I must say my patience was tried. And for reals, the movie is too long! 4/10

Hook (1991)

BANG-A-RANG.

I am on a nostalgia run. Perks of living at home and having all-day access to DVR. Man, this movie brings me back. It's as old as I am! #birthmovies. It definitely fell into the "most-quoted" category when I was eight. And the quotes aren't even that good... "I've just had an apostrophe." "I believe in fairies!" "Lookie lookie I've got Hookie!" "You need a mother very badly!"

Let's talk about Peter Pan for a sec. Well, to put it frankly, I don't really like it. Him. The book. The play. The story. Neverland. Wendy. I don't like those things. I like the IDEA of Peter Pan. Kind of. I mean, I listen to everything Dumbledore says, and he told Harry once, "It does not do to dwell on dreams and forget to live." But I guess if everyone listened to that advice, Disneyland would go bankrupt. And I suppose the moral of the story is that Neverland can't last for never. For ever. And that we have to grow up sometime. Just Peter Pan... doesn't. And Wendy is just annoying. Seriously, she's annoying.

But what if Peter Pan did grow up? Steven Spielberg's Hook does everything I could have ever wanted with the Peter Pan story. Because in Hook, Pan's grown up. Pan is Robin Williams. And Pan has completely forgotten his adventures in Neverland and turned into Mr. Darling all-work-no-play-no-time-for-kids as an acquisitions lawyer. He's married to Wendy's granddaughter Moira (Caroline Goodall) and has two kids Jack (Charlie Korsmo), and Maggie (Amber Scott). He's not, like, father of the year or anything and his boy Jack kinda hates him. But when Pan left Neverland, he REALLY left. He left it so hard, he doesn't even know how to connect with kids least of all his own, and money has now become more important to him than adventures.

So then there's Hook. I mean Captain James Hook. The one armed-pirate person. The nefarious villain. Well, he steals Jack and Maggie right outa their bedroom and takes them straight on 'till morning. What sparks this? What bring Peter Pan's arch-enemy to go all thief-in-the-night and kidnap two innocent kids? Because he's not over this relationship, obviously. He wants the immature, won't-mature 12-year-old who tortured Hook and his goons for years to suffer, to die even. But CATCH. Hook's under the assumption that he and Pan are going to go at it for old times sake, laugh over hand-eating crocodiles while drinking margaritas (Petey's of age now) and put on a sword-show for his drunk pirate-band. Yeah, Peter can't remember anything. He can't fight. He can't fly. And he can't crow. Hook won't fight Peter like this. But he also won't abandon his plans to send him to his doom. So he gives Peter 3 days to get himself ready and rekindle some of the old green-tights pizazz.
Everything that I don't like about Peter Pan is brought full circle in Hook. My favorite scene is the brief re-cap of Peter's transformation from the boy who never grew up to the boy who did. We watch him deal with his fear of death by postponing it in Neverland. We see the sadness that came over young Pan when he realizes his mother forgot about him. We see him get sad again as he watches Wendy get older and turned from Gwenyth Paltrow into Maggie Smith. We see him give a real kiss to Wendy's granddaughter, and ultimately abandon his life in Neverland for the opportunity to be a father.

COME ON, IT KIND OF GIVES ME THE FEELS.

Everything that Peter learned in Neverland about adventure and love was forgotten in his corporate life. His return to Neverland reminded him why he left in the first place and why that was more important than anything else in the whole world. Hook is a charming fantasy that focuses on the important things.

All of these feel-good things would be nothing without the star-power performances of Julia Roberts as Tinkerbell, Maggie Smith (classy with a side of phenomenal) Robin Williams, Charlie Korsmo (Minnesota REPRESENT), Bob Hoskins as Smee and especially Dustin Hoffman as the Hook himself. Seriously, this movie deserves a watch if only for the Hoff Man. Animated Hook is a coward. Hoff Man Hook is a BAMF. He's a conniving, twisted, manipulative, clever, EVIL villain and that dufus smile of his just doesn't leave. Also, Robin Williams is pretty cool.
Perhaps this isn't Spielberg's greatest blockbuster - but I don't think it was meant to be. It's a hook. We all want to know what would happen if Peter Pan grew up. Perhaps some of the fairy tale's original magic is lost, but we're checking out Never Never Land through the eyes of a blinded adult. Only when Peter starts to figure things out do the colors and magic come out. (That being said, what IS that food they eat supposed to be ANYWAY?) I saw this movie as a child. And nothing trumps nostalgia. PAN IS BACK. 8/10